[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Thu Apr 21 16:09:29 CEST 2011
* Mikael Abrahamsson: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Mikael Abrahamsson: >> >>> I don't want the money, I just want there to be *substantial cost* to >>> take up a DFZ slot. >> >> And degrade overall routing quality because networks cannot afford >> announcing shorter paths? I don't think this is a good idea. > > Please elaborate. I don't understand your reasoning. How does > de-aggregation improve routing quality? It can make it possible for your network to choose a better path to the destination, even according to your own set of cost metrics. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]