[address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Nov 23 15:31:00 CET 2010
On 22 Nov 2010, at 16:45, David Monosov wrote: > This seems straight forward and reasonable. I'd like to express my support for > this change. Furthermore, my preference is for the ripe-<WG short code> prefix > proposed by James. Will the NCC have to update internal software systems to support this new nomenclature, and if so will it be complex or expensive to implement ? Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]