[address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
ripe at c4inet.net
Tue May 4 18:35:07 CEST 2010
Hi, On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 05:22:43PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > "if people can use PI to give single IPv6 addresses to their end > customers, we might see DSL deployments with single address + NAT, > and this not something I want to see"...) Me neither. Maybe change the policy to require assigning min /64 in conjunction with making it assignable? > Gert rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]