[address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Tue May 4 17:34:50 CEST 2010
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 17:22, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > "if people can use PI to give single IPv6 addresses to their end > customers, we might see DSL deployments with single address + NAT, > and this not something I want to see"...) What provisions are in place that would stop anyone from doing the same with PA space? What stops anyone from implementing them for both IPv6 PA & PI? Regards, Richard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]