[address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Tue May 4 16:58:52 CEST 2010
Richard, all - Richard Hartmann wrote: >> This discussion will of course be followed up on this mailing list. > > 3) Although I am in the comfortable position of being able to use PA > space exclusively, if the usage of PI space has indeed changed over > time, there seem to be three possible solutions: > > a) Force the users of said PI space to become LIRs and use PA space. I indeed think that convincing those PI space users to become LIRs after all bears quite some merits: "It regulatively makes sense to treat user groups the same way that are (almost) indistinguishable" is only one of them. Yet, I am not entirely sure what could be the convincing arguments (or in the absence thereof: the mild pressure) that should be applied to those PI space users. Oh, and yes: I am in favour of a v4/v6 harmonisation, too. Best, Carsten
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]