[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Smith
pfs at cisco.com
Fri Apr 16 01:49:29 CEST 2010
Hi James, James Blessing said the following on 13/04/10 23:54 : > On 13/04/2010 13:55, Ingrid Wijte wrote: >> PDP Number: 2010-02 > > Suggest Revised Text, just tweaking no real impact Actually, your suggestions are pretty major changes to the policy proposal. ;-) > Allocations from the last /8 > > The distribution of the last /8 held by the RIPE NCC will be done as > follows: > > 1. Unforeseen circumstances pool > > Once RIPE NCC recieves the final /8 from IANA, a /16 will be held in > reserve for some future uses, as yet unforeseen. In 2010-2, Alain and I proposed that once the RIPE NCC holds the *equivalent* of a /8 or less of IPv4 address space, the policy would apply. This is different from when RIPE NCC receives the final /8 from IANA, as there may well be still be some IPv4 address space remaining in other blocks. > 2. Allocations for LIRs from the last /8 > > On application for IPv4 resources when the RIPE NCC the final /8 has > been allocated by IANA to RIPE, LIRs will receive IPv4 addresses > according to the following: > > - LIRs may only receive one allocation from the final /8. The size of > the allocation made under this policy will be no larger than a /22. > Other space may be provided to the LIR should additional space outside > of the final /8 be available at the point of the request. We actually intended 2010-2 to apply to the remaining equivalent of a /8, not the last /8 that RIPE NCC receives from IANA. (For example, this could be two /11s from one /8 block, a /10 from another /8 block, and one /9 from a third /8 block.) There would be no other IPv4 space left at this stage. > 3. Final Exhaustion > > In the event that the unforeseen circumstances pool /16 remains unused > in the time the final /8 covered by this policy has been distributed, a > /15 will be returned to the main pool to be distributed as per clause 2. > > Once this /15 has been used then the final /15 will also be returned to > the pool s should an unforeseen usage have not been found. I think you mean /16 here, right? Thanks very much for your feedback! philip --
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]