[address-policy-wg] Inet6num requirements in the db
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal to Remove Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy Implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Inet6num requirements in the db
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arkley, Patrick
patrick.arkley at se.verizonbusiness.com
Fri Oct 9 13:52:07 CEST 2009
Hi. I seem to recall from the RIPE meeting that Axel talked about the RIPE database as a valuable source of information. Also other organisations thinks it is a valuable and trustworthy source. It is also a very easy way of finding out the most likely users (at least one step down stream from the LIR) of a specific IP-range. But how come there is no requirement to add end-user objects for IPv6? Only the LIR's allocations are required. If we want to continue the work that has been done for IPv4 I think we need end-user objects for IPv6 as well. Maybe there is good reasoning behind this but the explanation I got from the RIPE NCC crew was not satisfactory. Best regards Patrick Arkley Verizon Europe Verizon Sweden AB - registrerat i Sverige med organisationsnummer 556489-1009- huvudkontorets adress: Armegatan 38, Box 4127, 171 04 Solna, Sverige -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20091009/5871e61c/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal to Remove Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy Implemented
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Inet6num requirements in the db
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]