[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernhard Schmidt
berni at birkenwald.de
Thu Nov 26 18:09:56 CET 2009
Hi, > I see you point, that more specifics of 2002::/16 are disallowed by RFC3056, > but this can easily be changed. 6rd uses the same way to modify RFC3056: It > requires a huge parallel prefix (and route) per ISP. > > In order to overcome the situation I submitted a draft to the IETF. > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-donnerhacke-softwire-ipv6-6to4-00.txt Yeah, nice idea. Why not have router implementations do that by default? We just have hit 300k routes in IPv4, I see no reason why we should not have that amount in IPv6 as well. Bernhard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]