[address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Tue Jul 28 10:36:21 CEST 2009
Hi, On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:56:14PM +0200, Per Heldal wrote: > I've re-read the proposal, and I do agree that RIPE should not > hand out blocks smaller than what is defined as the minimum assignment. They don't. The defined minimum assignment size for IPv4 PI is a /32. > Handing out blocks smaller than what is permitted through general > filtering recommendations makes no sense. Sorry for the confusion. Now there's the catch: who defines what is "permitted" on the Internet? If we could get a clear document from the Internet Routing Police, we could tie the policy to that... Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]