[address-policy-wg] Re: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ted Mittelstaedt
tedm at ipinc.net
Fri Jul 24 00:24:55 CEST 2009
Eliot Lear wrote: > On 7/22/09 11:50 PM, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: >> How cheap do IPv4 addresses need to be to make it worthwhile for an >> equipment vendor to buy up addresses today to drive up the price and >> make it worthwhile for the market to buy carrier grade NAT boxes? >> > > If you attend next week's IETF in Sweden, you will see quite a number of > Cisco employees involved in nearly every aspect of IPv6, including > transition technologies. We are there because we continue to believe > that there is no Plan B(*), that IPv6 is the best way for the Internet > to grow. Tell your coworkers that until Linksys-owned-by-Cisco gear gets IPv6 buttons in it, IPv6 ain't a real thing to any org under 50 employees. The RVS4000 is a good first step - now, let's extend that code to the rest of the Linksys product line. You don't want to be embarrassed by DD-WRT, after all, do you? Ted
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]