[address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Thu Jul 16 15:04:57 CEST 2009
Hi, Stream Service || Mark Scholten schrieb: > If you ask me it should be allowed to use PI space for clients (and give > clients the option to use/maintain more than a /30 (IPv4)). It is also in my > opinion not to RIPE (community or the NCC) to ask that information. The > should ask for general usage, how much would be used for clients for > example. How many clients a company has shouldn't be important to get PI. [...] again - Assignments are made to End-Users. If you are not an End-User, you need to become LIR and get an Allocation from which you can assign to End-Users. If you have an Assigment, it's for YOU, and YOU only, not any 3rd parties. This is a basic concept for ages. It's very simple. What is so hard to understand there and where is your problem with that? -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Design & Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Complaint: Overly complicated when requesting PI space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]