[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun Jul 5 18:41:17 CEST 2009
Hi, On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:19:48PM +0200, Andreas Schachtner wrote: > > b) All requests are downscaled by a certain factor, as described in > > 2009-04 > > This sounds sensible to me. A downsscaling factor of 64 will give enough > address space to stay in the allocation business for some (small "some) years. How exactly would "downscaling" work? A company demonstrates need for (say) a /19, and they get 8192/64 = a /25 - while a newcomer demonstrates the need for a /24, and gets a /30... So if we go that way, quite some thought needs to go into implementation details. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]