[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI for HOSTING
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI for HOSTING
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI for HOSTING
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Tue Dec 22 13:51:27 CET 2009
> I just hear I can't use IPv6 PI network for hosting service. > And I want to talk about it ;) Where did you hear this? I just looked at section 8 of RIPE-472 and there is nothing mentioned there. > Yes, a few hosters I know are big companies, LIRs, trade > their traffic and so on. But majority are small companines > have from one server to one-two racks of hosting servers. > They will never become a LIR only for [useless now] IPv6 > address space. But they host a huge piece of resources need > by a lot of regular users. Yes, this is true. > So I think we should ASAP change IPv6 PI policy to let > hosting be the issue for IPv6 PI assignment. I don't see any problem with IPv6 PI and I don't understand what you want to change. Please tell us which document to change, and provide a suggestion for the new words to put in the document. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI for HOSTING
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI for HOSTING
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]