AW: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): AW: AW: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Dec 3 10:58:12 CET 2009
Hi, On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 09:51:28AM -0000, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > It is premature to claim that fees would be higher if you get > a large allocation for 6RD. It's highly unlikely to assume there will be consensus for "give me more addresse for less money, if all I need to do is speak the magic word" in the AGM. Of course we *could* do that - but in that case, I see significant resistance for loosening up the address policy for 6rd deployments (quite obvious from the discussion so far). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 144438 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): AW: AW: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]