[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
IP-Office KPN
ip-office at kpn.com
Tue Dec 1 09:12:23 CET 2009
I agree with Marco here. The policy (RIPE-481) states: 5.4.1. Assignment address space size End Users are assigned an End Site assignment from their LIR or ISP. The size of the assignment is a local decision for the LIR or ISP to make, using a minimum value of a /64 (only one subnet is anticipated for the End Site). With kind regards, ir. A.W. Hettema IP-Office KPN Internet +31(0)70 45 13398 ip-office at kpn.com -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Marco Hogewoning Sent: maandag 30 november 2009 22:21 To: michael.dillon at bt.com Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD > That's not the point. A /60 assignment is wrong. If software > developers and equipment vendors get the idea that /60 is > normal, then they will embed that assumption in their products > and it will make the transition from 6RD to native v6 more > difficult. You keep repeating this but which document or standard says /60 is wrong ? > There is no need to make customer assignments smaller > than /56. But why ? I can imagine /60 is enough for Joe the plumber even if sensor networks would take off... MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]