[address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-05 New Policy Proposal (Anycasting Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Agenda items for upcoming RIPE meeting?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tomas Hlavacek
tomas.hlavacek at elfove.cz
Fri Apr 10 01:00:51 CEST 2009
Greetings! I support this proposal. I definitely want (g|cc)TLD operators to have an opportunity to increase resilience by setting up multiple anycasting clouds. And I think that the actual anycast address space spent for this will not even approach the "worst case" prediction - equivalent of slightly over /15 additional space. If I am wrong and it would get wide spread to fill up the /15, it is worth for that in my opinion. Best regards, Tomas Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > PDP Number: 2008-05 > Anycasting Tier 0/1 ENUM <cut> -- Tomáš Hlaváček <tomas.hlavacek at elfove.cz>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Agenda items for upcoming RIPE meeting?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]