[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Tue Mar 25 02:44:08 CET 2008
On Mar 19, Filiz Yilmaz <filiz at ripe.net> wrote: > PDP Number: 2008-02 > Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR I oppose this proposal on the grounds that it is already easy enough (almost automatic actually) for LIRs to receive an IPv6 allocation. I do not believe that it would remove real-world impediments to IPv6 deployment in a significant-enough number of LIRs to justify the risks associated with automatic one-size-fits-all allocations. The eventuality of a LIR to move to a more expensive billing category as the result of an unsolicited allocation should be enough in itself to consider this proposal unacceptable. -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20080325/d272c739/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]