[address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Thu Mar 20 20:04:19 CET 2008
On 20/03/2008 17:57, "Leo Vegoda" <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote: [...] > If an LIR gets an IPv6 allocation this way and does not want it or use it, > might their annual fee rise as a result? It's important not to move someone > from the 'extra small' to the 'small' billing category because they received > an IPv6 allocation they did not request. It looks like I missed the statement about this in the analysis the RIPE NCC provided and the answer is "probably not". Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-02 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PA to Every LIR)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]