This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Wed May 16 11:46:16 CEST 2007
Michael, [ stripping out a lot of content to just say what I want to say... ] On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:38:11AM +0100, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: > At this point, I think it is inappropriate to continue the Central > ULA discussion on the RIR policy lists. Agreed. > In fact, if any policy were to come out of such a discussion, I > would vote against it [...] Me too (well, the RIPE region doesn't vote on policies, but rather say I would oppose Central ULA proposals). -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]