[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 – Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stefan Camilleri
stefan.camilleri at maltanet.net
Tue Oct 24 12:14:18 CEST 2006
Hi, I think that the modifications as proposed, though still not *there* are a big improvement on existing text particularly with the dropping of the requirement for 200 /48 assignments. I fully support the new Proposal Regards. Stephen SC4079-RIPE > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net > [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of JORDI > PALET MARTINEZ > Sent: L-Erbgħa, 27 ta' Settembru 2006 12:02 > To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and > Assignment Policy (2006-02) > > Hi all, > > Same for this one ... Looking for further inputs to this > policy proposal. > > As the discussion period for this proposal > (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2006-02.html) is > almost over, I will like to ask for the latest inputs in > order to further decide how to proceed. > > Filiz arranged some stats about the discussion (thanks a lot > for that !) last July, and afterwards, even if the discussion > period has been extended, I don't recall having seen new comments. > > The stats don't include my own postings: > > >>> - there were 39 posts from 14 different individuals about it. > >>> > >>> - 8 people supported it. > >>> > >>> - 1 person *seemed* to be in favour of keeping the current policy. > >>> > >>> - 5 people made comments which I could not identify a > clear support > >>> or objection. > > So someone else will like to say anything new or clarify > their view in favor or opposition to the proposal ? > > Regards, > Jordi > > > > > > > ********************************************** > The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org > > Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! > http://www.ipv6day.org > > This electronic message contains information which may be > privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be > for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not > the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, > distribution or use of the contents of this information, > including attached files, is prohibited. > > > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 – Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy (2006-02)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]