[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Oct 4 17:35:09 CEST 2006
Sascha Lenz wrote: [...] > For (standard) IPv6 assignments, you don't even have to ask RIPE in most > cases by default. [...] Which makes me remember again that I added the following comment to similar discussions in the past: "I don't believe that the /`whatever` is a useful yardstick to reasonably measure the complexity, difficulty or quality of request assessment for an assignment." My only problem is that I don't know which conclusion to draw from this, regarding the AW... Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 New Policy Proposal (Minimum IPv4 Assignment Window)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]