[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
ripe-lst at eirconnect.net
Mon May 8 20:01:46 CEST 2006
On Monday 08 May 2006 06:28, Florian Weimer wrote: > In the latter case, a > rather significant fee is needed to turn global inconvenience into a > local one. An arbitrary fee, specifically designed to block someone's entry into *any* market, is *illegal*, at least in any non-communist country that I know. I also don't understand the whole decision circling back, endlessly, to restrictive policies when nobody actually seems to want IPv6 (assuming this is still what we're talking about) rgds, s.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]