[address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
s.steffann at computel.nl
Thu Dec 14 01:23:50 CET 2006
Hi Leo, > Several people raised concerns that new LIRs may not have sufficient > experience to make good decisions with a /21 AW. This is a valid > concern but I do not believe a series of incremental AW raises would > provide the most effective support to new LIRs. Instead, I have > modified the proposal so that new LIRs would get a /21 AW six months > after receiving their first allocation. They would need to send in > requests as now until then. This should ensure that the LIRs most in > need of support receive it, while reducing the administrative > overhead for the vast majority of LIRs. Sounds like a very good solution/proposal to me. Thanks! Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-07 Discussion Period extended until 17 January 2007 (First Raise in IPv4 Assignment Window Size)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]