[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Last Call: 'BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Tue Aug 29 12:12:53 CEST 2006
> I have a question though, the proposal includes the notion of "major > issue", perhaps this could be specified a bit more? Or is it clear how > this would be interpreted by a hostmaster processing an application, that > if the customer adds "I need to advertise this on the public internet" it > will automatically be known that a at least a /24 is needed? If the organization is simultaneously applying for an AS number or the organization already has an AS number, then we should consider routing to be a major issue if the organization says that it is. After all, the only purpose of having an AS number is to do routing. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Policy Proposal (PI Assignment Size)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Fwd: Last Call: 'BGP Support for Four-octet AS Number Space' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-idr-as4bytes)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]