[address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jorgensen
rogerj at jorgensen.no
Sun Apr 23 10:54:35 CEST 2006
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Gert Doering wrote: > > The nice thing about Internet (as opposed to the telephone system) is > > the fact that we have DNS - and thus no need to take our "numbers" with > > us to be reachable. > > This is certainly the theory. However, if you are a growing ISP, > renumbering from PA space from another LIR to your own PI space or > LIR/PA space can be - depending on how your customers are configured - > pure pain. > > The portability associated with PI space is also important in one other > view, in that it allows the holder to switch providers quickly and > efficiently. There's no tie-in of any form, and this is something which > is extremely important to business. So what you are saying are we need a better way to configure, reconfigure/change the connection to the end-users/customers? Thought IPv6 was suppose to solve that issue. -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | roger at jorgensen.no | - IPv6 is The Key! -------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Just say *NO* to PI space -- or how to make it lessdestructive
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]