[address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
woeber at cc.univie.ac.at
Mon Oct 10 15:22:46 CEST 2005
Denis Walker wrote: > leo vegoda wrote: > > >>On Oct 5, 2005, at 2:28 pm, Jørgen Hovland wrote: >> >>[...] >> >> >>>I apologise if this is moot, but an answer would really be appreciated. >>>This becomes a problem with private users as it already is today. We >>>can't store data about every single private user into a public >>>database, and there might also be issues regarding the privacy act. >>>It breaks the "true spirit of IPv6"; "have enough addresses, and no >>>questions asked". >> >> > Can I ask a different question here? I have only seen the RIPE Whois > Database from the RIPE NCC side. I have never worked for an ISP/LIR so I > am not sure how you use all of the data contained in the Database. > > Does anyone actually use the addresses and phone numbers from person > objects? Or is all communication done these days by e-mail? As long as email is working, we prefer it over using phone:-) What we have seen over time is that smaller customers do some sort of channel hopping with their domain/mail and/or web services, and often forget to update the registry data. Then we try the phone, and the fax. Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2005-08 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]