[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elmar K. Bins
elmi at 4ever.de
Thu Mar 24 14:05:40 CET 2005
iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) wrote: > We're talking about TLDs here, not the root. There are very few TLDs > that even use the full 13 or so addresses that are possible without > using EDNS0. Country code TLDs have existed for 20 years without > trouble without anycast, so I really don't see why this would be > necessary now, especially as the shorter RTTs that are possible with > anycasting are extremely unlikely to make a noticeable real-world > difference. I don't see from where you take the right to decide for a TLD registry how they should run their operations. There are a lot of reasons for doing one or the other, but I cannot see where you come in. Apart from that, I can tell you that these shorter RTTs make a hell of a difference. Elmar. -- "Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren." (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2 at ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>) --------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #alpha: TLD Anycast Allocation Policy
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]