[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Mon Jul 11 19:47:08 CEST 2005
> RFC3879 deprecates "site-local" addresses for IPv6. I'm told > that the thinking is that sites should fence off a part of their > globally-routable IPv6 assignment for any "enterprise-local" > requirements they may have. the thinking at the time of killing site-local addresses was that, as they were specified, they had very complex and ill-thought-out routing implications (somewhat typical of the ivtf's ipv6 effort). >> What should they do, use some random number? > 2002:0a00/24 anyone? if they are really not connecting, why do we or they care? if they might be connecting, then we have to make some decisions. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal #eta : IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy - definition for "End-Site
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]