[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal: #Zeta Adding Regional Boundaries to policy documents
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] last Call: Policy proposal #beta HD ratio policy proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hans Petter Holen
hpholen at tiscali.no
Fri Jul 1 00:19:11 CEST 2005
Dear all, After some thinking I have deceided to withdraw this proposal for two reasons. i) I am not able to find a wording that properly reflects the inention ii) There would be a conflict of interest if I were to declare consensus on a proposal authored by myself. others are of course welcome to reword and submit another proposal. best regards, Hans Petter Holen > Dear Address Policy WG, > This policy proposal is nothing more than an editorial change - but we > still feel it is fair to run it trough the PDP. > As I do not expect much discussion I propose the discussion phase to > end by May 1st. > > While I am voicing this proposal the suggestion actualy comes from our > excellent RIPE NCC staff. Thanks leo for pointing this out. > > Best Regards > Hans Petter Holen > Address Policy > > 1. Number Zeta > > 2. Policy Proposal Name: Adding Regional Boundaries to policy > documents > > 3. Author > > a. name: Hans Petter Holen > > b. e-mail: hpholen at tiscali.no > > c. telephone: +47 45066054 > > d. organisation: Visma IT AS > > 4. Proposal Version: > > > > 5. Submission Date: 16/4-2005 > > > > 6. Suggested WG for discussion and publication > > Address policy type > > > > 7. Proposal type: > > a. modify > > > > 8. Policy term: > > a. permanent > > > > 9. Summary of proposal > > > > Our AS assignment policy has the following statement in it: > > > > "The RIPE NCC assigns AS Numbers for Autonomous Systems > located in the RIPE NCC service region" > > > > Neither the IPv4 nor the IPv6 policy documents have such a > clear statement in them. It might be a good idea to add a > similar statement to those documents when they are updated. > > > > 10. Policy text > > a. Current (if modify): > > b. New: > > > > 11. Rationale: > > a. Arguments supporting the proposal > > Clearification of the scope of the documents > > > b. Arguments opposing the proposal > > n/a >
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] last Call: Policy proposal #beta HD ratio policy proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]