[address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Sun Apr 24 11:12:08 CEST 2005
On 22-apr-2005, at 9:39, Gert Doering wrote: >> What is it that is needed to get a decision made regarding >> rejection or >> approval of this proposal? > ... I am not sure whether I can see any sort of consensus yet. I am sure: there isn't any. > We have very loud voices that oppose the change, other voices want > much more > than that, and a number of people agree with it. If I do some sort of > "averaging", the "average opionion" from this could be "yes, go for > it", > but basically it comes down to "what's our definition of consensus" > now. Well, my definition of "consensus" doesn't include any averaging... I'm thinking: why don't we get a group of people representing the different viewpoints together in Stockholm and try to hash out a compromise? However, this means the "free for all" proponents need to be willing to do some compromising. Dropping the 200 limit and giving everyone who pays the LIR fee a /32 isn't my idea of a compromise. Iljitsch
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 InitialAllocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]