end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Tue Apr 5 15:58:10 CEST 2005
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote: >> And that's exactly the problem. This forum is more or less a marketing >> forum, and as such it's the wrong place to decide on these issues, as >> these are ENGINEERING tradeoffs. > > Name the engineering problems of end-user PI. (Un)fortunately nobody > was yet able to show convincing prove that there IS a problem. Stop > FUDding. I for one don't want to see the routers CPUs' screaming red when a random brazilian ISP experiences a fiber cut and I see 5,000 v6 prefixes churning in most routers in the world because of that. PI to end-users => lots of processing on routers when those sites, their ISPs, transits, ..., experience failures. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): end-user PI issues [Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal: #gamma IPv6 Initial Allocation Criteria]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]