[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Jun 25 10:01:58 CEST 2004
Hi, On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:23:26AM +0200, Oliver Bartels wrote: > And to show the complete nonsense of the /48 rule: > This will either even exclude companies like AOL or T-Online > from IPv6 if they do not intend to assign /48's to their > *residential* customers, or will force them to do so, which > sooner or later again means: > New prefix, full table, game over. This argument doesn't hold. Look at Telia - they got a /20. That's enough address space for at least 5 million /48s. Nothing precludes AOL or T-Online from applying for a /18, or even more, based on their customer numbers. (Also, if "every ISP that is able to fill a /20" will insert a 2nd or 3rd prefix into the global table, it definitely won't kill any router) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 60210 (58081) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]