[address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Jun 17 22:09:55 CEST 2004
Hi, On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 01:21:39PM +0100, Michael.Dillon at radianz.com wrote: > You have come right to the crux of the problem. The rules make it > unnecessarily difficult to get IPv6 addresses which makes it hard > for LIRs to get the addresses needed to run trials. For trials, you don't need your own allocation. If you're serious about deployment, you can get an allocation. [..] > This means that the risk of doing the wrong thing is vastly > smaller than it was with IPv4. We should plan to err on the side > of simplicity and flexibilty, i.e. give everyone an IPv6 allocation > if they already have an IP network. There is very little downside > to doing this. The members of all the RIR communities (*you*) have clearly voiced that they did not want this. *I* did propose, some years in the past, to just give a /32 to every LIR that asks for it... Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 60210 (58081) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]