[address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Erik Lindqvist
kurtis at kurtis.pp.se
Tue Jan 20 20:07:56 CET 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joao, On 2004-01-20, at 16.50, Joao Damas wrote: > This goal could very well be achieved by keeping the addresses of the > servers you are already using and migrating all other active IP's out > of the /24 that contains the address you want to "anycast". After all, > none of the root servers that are anycasting today have renumbered > (one that is not anycasting today will renumber soon because they > can't apply what I just described, which was unfortunate). > This was actually spelled out as a problem with NEW services (TLDs) moving to anycast. That is people who do not have their own addresses at all at this point. Best regards, - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQA18j6arNKXTPFCVEQKIgQCfdI0l1TMNy2mmCWtP/umLcpr23K0An2FL J7KQTOTKYhprMKX9QV7sutrO =1b17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE Access Policy Change Request to allow allocations to critical infrastructure
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]