[address-policy-wg] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Morgado
chbm at cprm.net
Fri Apr 23 15:32:58 CEST 2004
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Joao Damas wrote: > A new draft requesting expansion of RFC 1918 space by adding 3 /8s to > space reserved for private use. > > Given the presented justification (see introduction): > > "Given the policies for acquiring additional public > space it is not reasonable for them to acquire such space for use in > their private networks. " > Hi João, my reading is "acording to policy, the request would fail the 'can private space be used' check". However, I also read a "making request for private networks is such an hassle" subtext which might be due to my lack of English skills, the author's lack of English skills, or both :) Either way, it seems like a rather poor draft on the whole and doesn't seem to have been particularly though through. Regards -- Carlos Morgado <chbm at cprm.net> - Internet Engineering - Phone +351 214146594 GPG key: 0x75E451E2 FP: B98B 222B F276 18C0 266B 599D 93A1 A3FB 75E4 51E2 The views expressed above do not bind my employer.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]