[address-policy-wg] RE: [address-policy-wg] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-1918bis-00.txt

  Hi Joao,

>A new draft requesting expansion of RFC 1918 space by adding 3 /8s to 
>space reserved for private use.
>
>Given the presented justification (see introduction):
>
>"Given the policies for acquiring additional public
>    space it is not reasonable for them to acquire such space for use in
>    their private networks. "

  what is the word "them" referring to?

  Or should I just read this draft (on top of some other MByte of stuff
  that should be read ;-)

>I am left a bit confused about the statement and would like to have the 
>wg request the RIPE NCC to ask the author for further clarification
>
>Regards,
>Joao Damas

  Thanks,
  Wilfried                                     ( https://cert.aco.net/ )
 _________________________________:_____________________________________
  Wilfried Woeber                 : e-mail: Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
  UniVie Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33
  Universitaetsstrasse 7          : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140
  A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe  : RIPE-DB: WW144, PGP keyID 0xF0ACB369
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ...there's no place like 127.0.0.1 (or ::1 ?)