[acm-tf] RIPE 64 - Do We Need To Meet?
Brian Nisbet brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Sun Apr 15 08:29:29 CEST 2012
On 14/04/2012 21:52, Peter Koch wrote: > Brian, > >> As 2011-06 is still, effectively, in discussion phase, awaiting new text >> from Tobias, I'm not sure if there's any reason for the TF to meet at >> RIPE 64. If folks think differently, let me know and I'll arrange a meeting. > > apologies for the late reply. I'd be available for a meeting Monday morning. > It appears to me that some of the blatant misconceptions about correctness > and compliance that have surfaced on the anti-abuse-wg list recently > might be relevant to the 2011-06 proposal. But then I know it's late > for logistics and there's no _urgent_ need for a meeting. Thanks for that Peter. I think it is too late to try to organise something for tomorrow morning, but I'm sure there'll be the opportunity to discuss things at the meeting and perhaps organise a conference call in the coming weeks? A new version of 2011-06 should be released to the community soon and there is an agenda slot to discuss it on Thursday. There also seems to be movement again in favour of a policy regarding verification. I say this, of course, without implying anything from my point of view or even if I think that consensus can be reached, but voices are being raised again. I think, either way, sharing your thoughts on the misconceptions would be useful to the TF at the very least. Thanks and see some of you in Ljubljana very soon. Brian.
[ Acm-tf Archive ]