About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
Draft and Discussion Documents
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
Archived Drafts Archived Drafts
Draft Documents Procedure Procedure
Policy Development Process Policy Development
Policy Proposals Policy Proposals
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
PDF

RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2004

(Articles of Association of 1997)

RIPE NCC

Date: July 2003
Document ID: ripe-t.b.a.
Updates: ripe-255


For 2004 the charging scheme has been revised to align it with membership developments and to improve the current algorithm for defining member categories.

In the current charging scheme, the categories are based solely on IPv4 allocations over time. In the Charging Scheme 2004, member categories are based on IPv4, IPv6 and AS Number allocations over time giving a more fair reflection of the resources used from the RIPE NCC by each member.

The main changes in the Charging Scheme 2004 include the following:

  • Takeover fee for current members who take over other closed members or who take over allocations from other members
  • Revised algorithm to determine the minimum category size for members
  • More transparent determination of borders between categories

The membership charges for 2004 are fixed annual charges and are based on the member category of a member. For the 2004 membership fees, and for a comparison with the membership charges since 2000, see the following table:

Annual Fees

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Small

2,400

2,100

1,800

2,750

2,450

Medium

3,350

2,950

2,500

3,750

3,350

Large

4,400

3,900

3,400

5,250

4,650

Start-up fee

2,100

2,100

2,100

2,500

2,500

Take over fee

-

-

-

-

1,250

Note: For all tables the figures for Small members include Enterprise members. Supernational members are not mentioned above because their fees are established on an individual basis based on the fee for Large members.

Membership development

Following the analysis of the growth so far in 2003, an increase in net membership is expected of approximately 6% over the year 2003. Taking into account expected member closures and a decline in the growth for 2004 of new members, a net growth of 4% is expected in 2004.

The membership figures for 2000, 2001, 2002 and the projections for the remainder of 2003 and the year 2004 are as follows:

Number of LIRs

2000

2001

2002

Projection 2003

Budget 2004

Small

1,978

2,536

2,503

2,727

2,718

Medium

459

441

614

612

725

Large

130

145

152

152

181

Total membership

2,567

3,122

3,269

3,491

3,624

Net Growth %

51%

22%

5%

6%

4%

Member score algorithm

To determine the member category for a member, a score is calculated on the basis of the resources allocated to the member over time. The scoring system is based on member resource allocations/assignments taking into account both IPv4 and IPv6 allocations as well as AS Number assignments. For the purpose of this scoring algorithm, an allocation of IPv4 /20 is deemed to be equivalent to one IPv6 /32 allocation or to an assignment of one AS Number. For an example of how scoring units are determined based on resource usage see the table below.

Prefix IPv4

Prefix IPv6

ASN

Scoring unit

IPv4 / 21      

IPv6 / 33      

 

0.5

IPv4 / 20      

IPv6 / 32      

1 ASN          

1

IPv4 / 19      

IPv6 / 31      

2 ASN        

2

IPv4 / 18      

IPv6 / 30      

4 ASN        

4

Note: To establish scoring units based on larger or smaller resource usage, the same principles apply.

Using this matching system, the following algorithm is run to determine the total score per member:

S (reg) = ΣNi=1 ai * ti

ai = Scoring unit

ti = Time function of allocation/assignment i ( year of allocation – 1992 )

N = Number of allocations/assignments

The total score per member is the sum of all allocation scores for that member with a time factor applied to give more weight to recent allocations. Thus, the relative weight of a given allocation decreases over time.

Starting from the lowest score, all members are ranked in order depending on their score. Members with the same scores get identical rankings. The member categories are defined using the following cumulative boundaries:

  • 75% of the members will make up the Small member category
  • 95% of the members will make up the Medium and Small member categories
  • The remaining members will make up the Large member category

    Note: These boundaries cannot be fixed precisely as it may occur that a set of members with the same score fall across the boundary between member categories. When this happens the boundary will be moved to the nearest point below, which means that the actual percentage will deviate slightly and the next member category will start from that level.

Maximum percentage of total members per category

Member Category

2000

2001

2002

July 2003

Cumulative % 2004

Small

77 %

81 %

77 %

78 %

75 %

Medium

18 %

14 %

19 %

18 %

95 %

Large

5 %

5 %

4 %

4 %

100 %

The scores for members will be determined on 30 September 2003. The member categories will be made publicly available and every individual member will be notified of their member score and member category by e-mail.

Change Matrix - expected changes of members between the member categories

From:                      To:

Small

Medium

Large

Small

96 %

4 %

0 %

Medium

11 %

86 %

3 %

Large

0 %

9 %

91 %

Note: Enterprise members remain in the small member category.

 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community