ripe-72 RIPE NCC Internet Numbers Registration Procedures 16 October 1992 version 0.7 M.Terpstra ** This documents obsoletes ripe-65, version 0.6 of this document ** Abstract ======== This document describes the procedures for the reassignment of IP network numbers from blocks obtained from the RIPE Network Coordination Centre. It deals with items as providing information for the RIPE database, as well as reassignment of IP addresses in light of the "Supernetting" proposal, as documented in RFC 1338, by Vince Fuller et al. Introduction ============ Since May 1st 1992, the RIPE Network Coordination Centre (NCC) is acting as a delegated registry for IP networks numbers to NICs and NOCs in Europe. It is RIPE NCC policy not to give out network numbers to individual organisations, who should refer in turn, to their IP network service provider. The mission of the RIPE NCC is to give network numbers to the various service providers and NICs. The NICs and NOCs can then reassign the actual IP network numbers to organisations requesting IP network numbers. Class B Network Number Allocation Procedure =========================================== Service providers can request Class B network numbers on a one-by-one basis from the RIPE NCC. Because class B address space is a critical resource, a request for a class B network number must be accompanied by a justification in terms of the requesting organisation's size, current network and expected network growth. The requestor should also make clear why they cannot use a block of class C network numbers to achieve their goals. The RIPE NCC will review requests using the same standards as any other Internet Registry, particularly the US NIC. Class C Allocation Procedures ============================= NICs and NOCs accepting a block of class C numbers agree to adhere to the following procedures: A) The RIPE NCC will assign complete class C blocks to individual NICs and NOCs. They can be requested from . B) In order to prevent implementation problems, network numbers ending with 0 or 255 should NOT be reassigned. C) Full information about reassigned network numbers must be reported back to the RIPE NCC in full RIPE database format (ref ripe-13). The complete entries should be sent immediately after reassignment to . The RIPE NCC is ready to accept block entries for the RIPE database. For block syntax, please contact the RIPE NCC. D) Reassignment of class C network numbers should be done in a manner that facilitates Supernetting (see next section). E) Requests for network numbers should be reasonable. All NICs and NOCs should prevent stockpiling of network numbers. F) On first request from the RIPE NCC, the class C network numbers not yet reassigned, must be returned to the RIPE NCC. Supernetting ============ NICs and NOCs reassigning IP network numbers are urgently requested to read the Supernetting proposal by Vince Fuller et al. This document can be obtained from the rfc section of the RIPE document store or other RFC servers. It is called rfc1338.txt. The Supernetting proposal was made to reduce the increase of routing table size in the current Internet. It proposes to create a hierarchy of IP network numbers, which can then be aggregated resulting in less routing table entries in routing equipment. While this proposal has not been formally adopted we expect that something at least along the same principle will be implemented in the near future. Here is how it works: If an