RE: Migration issues: route creation

["Lu, Ping" <]

Comment followed.

> 
> You can configure the software to resolve these references internally
> (by creating "dummy" objects). However, you cannot request "selective
> mirroring" for a particular types of objects.
> 

What happen if you don't want to share some of the person objects ?
At least, I believe APNIC has a policy to guard private information so they
may not want
to mirror the maintainer and person objects.

> Referential integrity needs to be satisfied only within a 
> single source.
> That is TEST1-MNT with RADB source and TEST1-MNT with the RIPE one are
> in fact different objects.
> 

How about AS3561 in RIPE, ARIN and APNIC ? In reality this is the same AS 
( assigned by ARIN but need to be present in RIPE and APNIC as well )
And this will be a route creation problem, we will need to register some
route
objects in RIPE that originates from AS3561 very soon.

Ping Lu
Cable & Wireless USA
Network Tools and Analysis Group
W: +1-703-292-2359
E: plu@localhost