|
> Malik, I vote for MENOG. It'll be great if we can
make it,
> of course it'll need a lot of discussion regarding
where will
> it based, rules, who will operate it's
website, who could be
> a member & how,...etc.
Here is a suggestion with respect MENOG based on
experience with the original NANOG:
"Keep it organizationally lightweight with the clear and
simple goal of technical information exchanges for techies by techies".
All policy issues, excepts for the very important
understanding the technical implications of such policies, should be handled by
different groups (e.g. ARISPA, others). The reason to keep
non-technical policy issues explicitly out of its mandates is, while
important, the commercial/national politics behind the scene can be
overwhelming and beyond the scope of the people MENOG should be serving.
While policy is outside the mandate of MENOG, it can serve as a technical
advisory entity to approrpiate policy making groups.
Best regards,
John Leong
|