About RIPE NCC | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE NCC  
RIPE NCC Mail Archives
     
Mailing Lists:
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Link to NCC Lists Archive NCC Lists Archive
Link to RIPE Lists Archive RIPE Lists Archive
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [ncc-regional-middle-east] Regional Peering

  • To: Salim Bader Al Mazrui salim@localhost
  • From: Saleem Albalooshi saleem@localhost
  • Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:05:58 +0300
  • Cc: John Leong leong@localhost, mawan@localhost, Salman Al-Mannai salmannai@localhost, Fahad AlShirawi Fahad@localhost, ncc-regional-middle-east@localhost, MAJEED@localhost

Thanks Salim For this good news.
This clearly highlights that we have very effective people in this list.
Let us keep up this good work and more team work and corporation for the benefits of our communities.

Salim Bader Al Mazrui wrote:

Dear colleagues;

I have been following up on the discussions going on and I wanted to inform you'll that Omantel has established peering with Etisalat on Wednesday 24th May using 5 x E1 links. We are only announcing our local networks to each other. In the business sector, many establishments communicate with their regional offices in the middle east over the Internet. We are presently seeing over 4 Mbps traffic after establishing the peer.

Regards

Salim Bader Al-Mazrui
Director Informatics Unit
Networks & Technology
Oman Telecommunications Company

Tel: +968-631881
Fax: +968-695482
GSM: +968-99423279



-----Original Message-----
From: ncc-regional-middle-east-admin@localhost on behalf of John Leong
Sent: Fri 5/26/2006 8:27 PM
To: mawan@localhost 'Salman Al-Mannai'; 'Fahad AlShirawi'; 'Saleem Albalooshi'
; MAJEED@localhost
Subject: Re: [ncc-regional-middle-east] Regional Peering

Re: [ncc-regional-middle-east] Regional PeeringInteresting point from Malik. VoIP. My initial feeling is even if the routing between GCC countries through US is totally inefficient from engineering point of view, but if most of the data IP traffic is really not between the GCC country, we may not care. However, if VoIP is to be a significant service, then I suspect there may be a lot of VoIP traffic between GCC countries. In which case, one may pay attention to ITU recommendation G.114 on One-way Transmission Time (note: not round trip) and its effect on voice services. It suggests to keep the one way latency to under 150 ms. 150 - 400 ms is acceptable depending on application. Anything above 400 ms is not acceptable.

Regards,
John


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Malik Awan
  To: 'Salman Al-Mannai' ; 'Fahad AlShirawi' ; 'Saleem Albalooshi'
Cc: 'John Leong' ; ncc-regional-middle-east@localhost ; MAJEED@localhost
  Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:03 PM
  Subject: RE: [ncc-regional-middle-east] Regional Peering


So far we have seen latency of up to 600ms (900ms not seen yet) within the region, which is not good for VoIP traffic.

  Regards,

  Malik





 

Next Section
     About RIPE NCC | Service Announcements | Site Map | LIR Portal | About RIPE | Contact | Legal | Copyright Statement
RIPE NCC Homepage Go to the RIPE NCC LIRPortal Go to the RIPE Community pages