Re: [ncc-regional-middle-east] Regional Peering
-
To: Salim Bader Al Mazrui salim@localhost
-
From: Saleem Albalooshi saleem@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:05:58 +0300
-
Cc: John Leong leong@localhost, mawan@localhost, Salman Al-Mannai salmannai@localhost, Fahad AlShirawi Fahad@localhost, ncc-regional-middle-east@localhost, MAJEED@localhost
Thanks Salim For this good news.
This clearly highlights that we have very effective people in this list.
Let us keep up this good work and more team work and corporation for the
benefits of our communities.
Salim Bader Al Mazrui wrote:
Dear colleagues;
I have been following up on the discussions going on and I wanted to
inform you'll that Omantel has established peering with Etisalat on
Wednesday 24th May using 5 x E1 links. We are only announcing our
local networks to each other. In the business sector, many
establishments communicate with their regional offices in the middle
east over the Internet. We are presently seeing over 4 Mbps traffic
after establishing the peer.
Regards
Salim Bader Al-Mazrui
Director Informatics Unit
Networks & Technology
Oman Telecommunications Company
Tel: +968-631881
Fax: +968-695482
GSM: +968-99423279
-----Original Message-----
From: ncc-regional-middle-east-admin@localhost on behalf of John Leong
Sent: Fri 5/26/2006 8:27 PM
To: mawan@localhost 'Salman Al-Mannai'; 'Fahad AlShirawi'; 'Saleem
Albalooshi'
; MAJEED@localhost
Subject: Re: [ncc-regional-middle-east] Regional Peering
Re: [ncc-regional-middle-east] Regional PeeringInteresting point from
Malik. VoIP.
My initial feeling is even if the routing between GCC countries
through US is totally inefficient from engineering point of view, but
if most of the data IP traffic is really not between the GCC country,
we may not care.
However, if VoIP is to be a significant service, then I suspect there
may be a lot of VoIP traffic between GCC countries.
In which case, one may pay attention to ITU recommendation G.114 on
One-way Transmission Time (note: not round trip) and its effect on
voice services. It suggests to keep the one way latency to under 150
ms. 150 - 400 ms is acceptable depending on application. Anything
above 400 ms is not acceptable.
Regards,
John
----- Original Message -----
From: Malik Awan
To: 'Salman Al-Mannai' ; 'Fahad AlShirawi' ; 'Saleem Albalooshi'
Cc: 'John Leong' ; ncc-regional-middle-east@localhost ;
MAJEED@localhost
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:03 PM
Subject: RE: [ncc-regional-middle-east] Regional Peering
So far we have seen latency of up to 600ms (900ms not seen yet)
within the region, which is not good for VoIP traffic.
Regards,
Malik
|