Re: [irrtoolset]peval & whois.ripe.net

[Fredrik Widell <]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Engin Gunduz wrote:

> Dear Fredrik,
> Sorry for the late answer.
>
> I hope your problem has already been solved when we have
> put the new hardware into production, which is much faster.
> This should have solved the long query response time problem.
Yes, absolutely, but I still wonder why the expansion of
AS702:RS-CUSTOMER actually was totally wrong, it would have
been better with no answer at all, will this happen again
in a couple of years when it is time to change the hw for
the whois-server? it trashes peerings in a very bad manner
if/when it happens, so I'm just curious. Otherwise the
current whois-server is fast as **** :)

> Regards,
>
> --
> Engin Gunduz
> RIPE NCC Software Engineering Departmen
>
> On 2004-11-08 12:55:51 +0100, Fredrik Widell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > currently (and for the last 1-2 weeks) I am utterly unable
> > to fetch/make filterlists for peers with large as-sets,
> > to mee it seems whois.ripe.net is quite unresponsive, and
> > sometimes even delivers the wrong results with peval,
> > the example I have most trouble with atm below:
> >
> > peval -h whois.ripe.net -protocol ripe -no-as "AS702 AS702:RS-EURO
> > AS702:RS-CUSTOMER"
> >
> > mostly, this justs exits with a "141 pipe broken", but, sometimes
> > the result is ((AS702)) which is very far from the truth.
> >
> > So, can I still trust ripe-dbm to create my filterlists? or should
> > I get other means to make my filters?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > 	/Fredrik
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > KTHNOC, KTH, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden +46 8 790 65 17
> > -------------------------------------------------------
--

Mvh

	/Fredrik

-------------------------------------------------------
KTHNOC, KTH, S-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden +46 8 790 65 17
-------------------------------------------------------