|
|
 |
Re: [irrtoolset]Making IRRToolSet compile...
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:53:57 +0100
- Organization: Swisscom IP-Plus
Hi,
i had 4.8.1 compile on a x86 gentoo-linux 2.4.22 with gcc2.95.3, but
peval produced a segmentation fault so i went back to 4.7.3 which works
well.
The binary distributions (both 4.7.3 and 4.8.1) don't work on my system :-(
Cheers
Jan
Jon Lawrence wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 9:55 pm, Havard Eidnes wrote:
Hi,
me again. Someone pointed me towards IRRToolSet which is a bit
newer than RAToolSet. I'm trying to make IRRToolSet 4.8.1
compile on NetBSD 1.6 with gcc 2.95.3 and the libsdc++ which came
with that compiler.
First off: it seems that almost all of the diffs I sent earlier
against RAToolSet still have to be applied to IRRToolSet.
Second: how has anyone got IRRToolSet 4.8.1 to compile?!? I have
to ask, because I get:
c++ -c -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -I/usr/pkg/include
-I/usr/X11R6/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../src -I../../Core
prefix.cc prefix.cc: In method `void MPPrefixRanges::and(MPPrefixRanges
*)': prefix.cc:1147: implicit declaration of function `int assign(...)'
gmake[4]: *** [prefix.o] Error 1
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/pkgsrc/net/IRRToolSet/work/IRRToolSet-4.8.1/src/rpsl/rpsl'
...and implicit declarations in C++ are as far as I know fatal.
How can this compile at all on any other platform?
Fixing this appears to require more C++ skills or familiarity
with the code than I have, so assistance on this point would be
much appreciated.
I also haven't yet managed to get it to compile - I've just setup a debian 3.0
box so that I have a system with <gcc 3.x.x on which to play. The binary
version runs fine on the Debian box, which is good enough for my purposes at
present :)
Could someone post a system spec (software wise) that is known to work (for
compiling) - please include distro if possible.
Regards,
Jon
--
Jan Boogman / Swisscom IP-Plus AS3303 / Backbone Engineering / CCIE#7345
|
|
 |
 |