Re: [irrtoolset]Making IRRToolSet compile...

[Katie Petrusha <]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:08:05PM +0000, Jon Lawrence wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2004 9:55 pm, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > me again.  Someone pointed me towards IRRToolSet which is a bit
> > newer than RAToolSet.  I'm trying to make IRRToolSet 4.8.1
> > compile on NetBSD 1.6 with gcc 2.95.3 and the libsdc++ which came
> > with that compiler.
> >
> > First off: it seems that almost all of the diffs I sent earlier
> > against RAToolSet still have to be applied to IRRToolSet.
> >
> > Second: how has anyone got IRRToolSet 4.8.1 to compile?!?  I have
> > to ask, because I get:
> >
> > c++ -c -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -I/usr/pkg/include
> > -I/usr/X11R6/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../src -I../../Core 
> > prefix.cc prefix.cc: In method `void MPPrefixRanges::and(MPPrefixRanges
> > *)': prefix.cc:1147: implicit declaration of function `int assign(...)'
> > gmake[4]: *** [prefix.o] Error 1
> > gmake[4]: Leaving directory
> > `/usr/pkgsrc/net/IRRToolSet/work/IRRToolSet-4.8.1/src/rpsl/rpsl'
> >
> > ...and implicit declarations in C++ are as far as I know fatal.
> > How can this compile at all on any other platform?
> >
> > Fixing this appears to require more C++ skills or familiarity
> > with the code than I have, so assistance on this point would be
> > much appreciated.
> >

Dear Jon,

Please see http://www.ripe.net/db/irrtoolset for all the information.

> I also haven't yet managed to get it to compile - I've just setup a debian 3.0 
> box so that I have a system with <gcc 3.x.x on which to play. The binary 
> version runs fine on the Debian box, which is good enough for my purposes at 
> present :)

As far as I can remember, the README supplied together with IRRToolSet mentions that
IRRToolSet is unfortunately not yet gcc-3 compliant and therefore you cannot 
use this compiler :-( We will update the code to be gcc-3 compliant at some point.
But for now, please use gcc-2.95-*.

> 
> Could someone post a system spec (software wise) that is known to work (for 
> compiling) - please include distro if possible.

I can send you the binaries for platforms where it was compiled, but probably
ftp is more convenient source.

> 
> Regards,
> Jon

-- 
Kind regards,
Katie Petrusha
Software Engineering Department
RIPE NCC