Re: [irrtoolset]Making IRRToolSet compile...

[Jon Lawrence <]

On Wednesday 21 January 2004 9:55 pm, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> me again.  Someone pointed me towards IRRToolSet which is a bit
> newer than RAToolSet.  I'm trying to make IRRToolSet 4.8.1
> compile on NetBSD 1.6 with gcc 2.95.3 and the libsdc++ which came
> with that compiler.
>
> First off: it seems that almost all of the diffs I sent earlier
> against RAToolSet still have to be applied to IRRToolSet.
>
> Second: how has anyone got IRRToolSet 4.8.1 to compile?!?  I have
> to ask, because I get:
>
> c++ -c -I/usr/pkg/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -I/usr/pkg/include
> -I/usr/X11R6/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../src -I../../Core 
> prefix.cc prefix.cc: In method `void MPPrefixRanges::and(MPPrefixRanges
> *)': prefix.cc:1147: implicit declaration of function `int assign(...)'
> gmake[4]: *** [prefix.o] Error 1
> gmake[4]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/pkgsrc/net/IRRToolSet/work/IRRToolSet-4.8.1/src/rpsl/rpsl'
>
> ...and implicit declarations in C++ are as far as I know fatal.
> How can this compile at all on any other platform?
>
> Fixing this appears to require more C++ skills or familiarity
> with the code than I have, so assistance on this point would be
> much appreciated.
>
I also haven't yet managed to get it to compile - I've just setup a debian 3.0 
box so that I have a system with <gcc 3.x.x on which to play. The binary 
version runs fine on the Debian box, which is good enough for my purposes at 
present :)

Could someone post a system spec (software wise) that is known to work (for 
compiling) - please include distro if possible.

Regards,
Jon