RIPE Database Search

By pressing the "Search" button you explicitly express your agreement with the RIPE Database Terms and Conditions.

IPv4 Exhaustion

The RIPE NCC will reach the last /8 of IPv4 address space in the coming months.

Find out more
Service Announcements
  • All of our services are operating normally.

RIPE NCC Revenue in 1995

Daniel Karrenberg
RIPE NCC

Scope
This  memo  provides  an  overview  of the number of European Local Internet Registries, the customers of the  RIPE  NCC  and the associated revenue.  It provides historical data as well as projections for the second  half  of  1995 and into 1996.  The companion document  "RIPE  NCC  Expenditure   Planning 1995" describes the planned use of these funds.

Local Registries 1993-1996

The  total  number  of  local  IRs has been recorded reliably and in a comparable fashion for quite  some time.  Data is collected at the end of each quarter. The table below combines this historical  data  with my current projections until early 1996.

+---------------------+
|Quarter   Registries |
+---------------------+
|Q2/93         61     |
|Q3/93         75     |
|Q4/93         83     |
|Q1/94         96     |
|Q2/94        115     |
|Q3/94        130     |
|Q4/94        141     |
|Q1/95        179     |
|Q2/95        218     |
+---------------------+
|Q3/95        243     |
|Q4/95        275     |
|Q1/96        308     |
+---------------------+

A  graphical  representation  of  this data looks as follows:

350++---------------------------------------------------+
|                                                   |
|                                                   |
300++                                              *A   |
|                                            **     |
|                                          *A       |
|                                        **         |
250++                                      *A           |
|                                    **             |
|                                   A               |
200++                                 **                |
|                                *                  |
|                               A                   |
|                             **                    |
150++                            *                      |
|                     **A***A                       |
|                  *A*                              |
100++                **                                 |
|             **A                                   |
|     **A***A*                                      |
|   A*                                              |
50++---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Q2/933/934/931/942/943/944/941/952/953/954/951/96

There  is  a  pronounced  steepening of the curve at Q1/95.   This  increase  in  growth  rate  is   also observed  in DNS hostcount and registration services load data.


NOTE: In this memo the values for 2Q95 are treated as "observed" although the quarter is not completed yet.  The projected  values have been corrected with observed data of May 28th or  later  and  carry  a  high degree of confidence.

Registries by Type and Size
Since  the  beginning  of 1995 comparable data about the different types of registries  as  well  as  the associated  revenue  has  been collected.  The table.below gives the details about  the  number  of  registries:

+------------+-----------------+-----------------+
|            |    Observed     |    Projected    |
|Registries  |  Q4    Q1    Q2 |  Q3    Q4    Q1 |
|            |  94    95    95 |  95    95    96 |
+------------+-----------------+-----------------+
|            |                 |                 |
|  Large ISP |  17    17    18 |  18    19    21 |
| Medium ISP |  28    31    37 |  42    47    54 |
|  Small ISP |  51    84   115 | 134   159   182 |
| Enterprise |  14    15    16 |  17    18    19 |
|Last Resort |  31    32    32 |  32    32    32 |
|            |                 |                 |
|      Total | 141   179   218 | 243   275   308 |
+------------+-----------------+-----------------+


The number of registries in the "Projected"  columns have  been  estimated  using monthly averaged growth rates corrected with particular  expectations,  such as the closure of a number of registries now handled by EUnet's central IR.  These projections have  been made  extremely  conservatively,  i.e.  they  do not extend the growth observed in Q1 and  Q2  even linearily.

The latest observed data (May 28th) is shown between the observed and projected quarterly data points for comparison.  It represents roughly two thirds of the Q2/95 period.

Revenue
The following table shows the revenue  corresponding to the number of registries in the previous table:

+---------------+-----------------+----------------+
|               |    Observed     |   Projected    |
|Revenue (kECU) |  Q4    Q1    Q2 |  Q3    Q4   Q1 |
|               |  94    95    95 |  95    95   96 |
+---------------+-----------------+----------------+
|  Contribution | 488   573   656 | 691   714   ?  |
|     Committed |   0   440   558 | 587   607      |
|      Invoiced |   0   363   512 |                |
|               |                 |                |
|   Signup Fees |   0    74   152 | 202   266   ?  |
|  Committed(*) |   0    74   152 | 202   266   ?  |
|      Invoiced |   0    64   113 |                |
|               |                 |                |
|        Totals | 488   647   808 | 893   980      |
|     Committed |       514   710 | 789   873      |
|      Invoiced |       427   625 |                |
|               |                 |                |
|      Received |       195   443 |                |
+---------------+-----------------+----------------+

(*)  Commitments  for  signup fees are notrecorded separately at this point in time,however,  the  commitment rate of new registries is almost 100%.


The  table  shows  quite  clearly that we can safely expect to have, by the end of 1995, commitments  for an  amount  of at least 873 kECU, which considerably exceeds the expenditures currently  planned  in  the1995  budget  (407 kECU).  The rationale for this is given by reading the table as explained in the  following paragraphs.

The  total NCC revenue sources are given by all registries contributing their share, the Contributions, plus the signup fees received from new registries as they subscribe, the Signup Fees.  The first lines in each  section  represent  the amounts to be received assuming all registries would contribute what is due following the contributions model.

The  "Committed" lines represents the amount committed by signed service  agreements.   The  "Invoiced" lines  represent  the amount for which invoices have been sent out.  It must be noted that  amounts  committed  and  invoiced  are  not directly comparable, because  commitments  are  made  on an yearly basis, while part of the invoicing is done  half-yearly  or quarterly.

The  "Received" line gives the total amount of funds received.  By  comparing  this  line  to  the  total invoiced,  we  can see that the situation is improving.  During 1Q95, in fact, only 45% of the invoices was paid, while to date (end of 2Q95) already 70% of the invoices have been already paid.

The projected  "Contribution"  numbers  are  derived from  the estimated number of registries by applying the 1995 charging scheme. The commitments  projected are at 85% of the due value, which is very conservative as the bulk  of  the  non-committed  registries have  been  carried from previous years and new registries tend to sign the  agreement.  This  predicts the  income  for the RIPE NCC core services from the existing registries as well as possible, but conservatively.

The projected "Signup Fees" are also algorithmically derived from the registry projection (shown  in  the previous  table).  At  the end of Q4/95 we expect to have invoiced a total of ECU 266k  in  signup  fees. This revenue is earmarked for the initial support of new registries.  It  is  reasonable  to  spread  the expenditure assuming an initial support period of 12 months for each registry. With  this  assumption  we should  spend approximately ECU 174k on new registry support in 1995.

The 1996 revenue cannot  be  predicted  because  the 1996 charging scheme has not yet been determined.


Conclusions
The  RIPE  NCC  billing  and  cash-flow situation is excellent.  The new billing system and the  sanction "time permitting service" prove to be effective.

The  currently  projected  1995  revenue of ECU 873k considerably exceeds the currently planned  expenditure of ECU 407k.

ECU  174k  should  be  spent on support for new registries in 1995.





Previous GMs
More GMs